The application of psychology here reveals that a death sentence within prison remain inconsistent with values of proportionality during criminal punishment (APA, 2012). Because of the logical application of psychological analysis in this case, the Supreme Court declared that persons under 18 upon commission of any crime apart from homicide, remain unpunished with life prison minus parole. Because of the advancements in psychological science, the court observed that the juveniles remain less culpable relative to adults owing to their immaturity, susceptibility to external manipulations as well as unformed habits (Pinizzotto, 2003). Consequently, there arose a court observation that justifications for declaring life sentences to the juveniles are weaker owing to the young persons’ better prospects for rehabilitation as well as incompetency to predict consequences. It is notable that the above enlisted discoveries from this case have formed a basic spring board towards realization of the efficiency of forensic psychology in determining the outcomes of critical criminal cases within courts globally.
References
APA, (2012). Graham v. Florida and Sullivan v. Florida. Web.
Pinizzotto, A. (2003). Forensic Psychologist. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Web.
Struggling with online classes or exams? Get expert help to ace your coursework, assignments, and tests stress-free!